Weight Loss Interventions for Adults With Obesity-Related Asthma.

Obesity is a common asthma comorbidity in adults, contributing to higher patient morbidity and mortality. Conversely, weight loss can reduce the impact of obesity on asthma and improve patient outcomes by diverse mechanisms including modulating airway inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and improving lung function. Multiple lifestyle, nonpharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical interventions are effective at reducing weight in the general population. Fewer have been studied specifically in the context of patients with asthma. However, increasingly effective pharmacologic options for weight loss highlight the need for allergists and pulmonologists to understand the range of approaches that may directly or indirectly yield clinical benefits in asthma management. Weight loss interventions often require multidisciplinary support to create strategies that can realistically achieve a patient's personalized asthma and weight goals. This includes minimizing the adverse weight effects of glucocorticoids, which remain a mainstay of asthma management. Disparities in access, cost, and insurance coverage of weight loss interventions remain acute challenges for providers and patients. Future studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms of action of specific weight loss interventions on short-term and long-term asthma outcomes.

Progestogen Hypersensitivity.

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by diverse cutaneous manifestations, bronchospasm, and/or anaphylaxis. Possible triggers include ovarian progesterone and exogenous progestogens. The timing of symptoms is critical to diagnose PH: during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle for the endogenous form and after exposure to progestins for exogenous PH. Diagnostic modalities such as progesterone skin testing have low sensitivity and specificity for PH. When exogenous PH is suspected, the allergist should consider a progestogen challenge. Treatment strategies should be tailored for each patient, including symptom-directed therapies, ovulation suppression, and progesterone desensitization. Future studies should explore the mechanisms of PH, validation of diagnostic criteria, and standardization of treatment strategies.

Patient Characteristics Associated With Reactions to Mrgprx2-Activating Drugs in an Electronic Health Record-Linked Biobank.

BACKGROUND: Mas-related G protein-couple receptor x2 (Mrgprx2) activation underlies many common non-IgE-mediated adverse drug reactions (ADRs), yet the features of patients with reactions to Mrgprx2-activating drugs are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the patient-specific comorbidities and laboratory characteristics associated with listed reactions to Mrgprx2-activating drugs, including fluoroquinolones, morphine, neuromuscular blockade agents, vancomycin, and leuprolide. METHODS: We used a retrospective, observational cohort study design using electronic health record data from adults with an Mrgprx2-activating drug exposure recorded within a hospital system clinical Biobank. Odds ratios (ORs) and incidence rate ratios for clinical characteristics associated with ADRs, including immediate hypersensitivity reactions, were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 59,763 patients exposed to Mrgprx2-activating drugs, 4846 had a listed ADR. Female sex, White race, asthma (OR: 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-1.94), chronic urticaria (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.46-2.05), and mastocytosis (OR: 12.79, 95% CI: 5.98-27.02) were associated with increased odds of a reaction. Overall, patients with allergic disease had 1.21 times the rate of an ADR compared with patients without allergic disease. Elevated absolute eosinophil count was inversely associated with reactions, and there was no association with elevated total IgE. Observed associations were similar in a patient subgroup with immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSION: Specific allergic diseases and common allergic biomarkers are differentially associated with ADRs to Mrgprx2-activating drugs. These findings from a large, "real world" drug-exposed population highlight clinical factors that may contribute to non-IgE-mediated drug allergy.

Presentation and natural history of progestogen hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published medical literature on the clinical presentation, risk factors, and natural history of hypersensitivity reactions to progestogens. DATA SOURCES: Through the use of PubMed, we conducted a review of allergy, dermatology, and obstetric literature for cases and case series of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to exogenous or endogenous progestogens. There are no longitudinal, prospective studies related to progestogen hypersensitivity. STUDY SELECTIONS: Publications were selected that described cases that were clinically consistent with progesterone hypersensitivity and positive test results or clear symptoms with exposure to progestogens to confirm the diagnosis. RESULTS: Progestogen hypersensitivity symptoms can be triggered by endogenous progesterone or exogenous progestins used for contraception or fertility treatments. Symptoms are varied and include dermatitis, urticaria, asthma, and anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Although the medical literature on progestogen hypersensitivity is limited to case reports and small case series, significant heterogeneity exists in clinical presentation among patients.